"Batman Returns", Tim Burton's sequel to his 1989 blockbuster movie
adaptation of the Bob Kane DC comic book, opens with Tucker and Esther
Cobblepot (two rich Gotham socialites) ridding themselves of their unseen
baby boy. This baby seems to have some sort of deformity or monstrous thing
about him (i.e. he likes to eat pussy... cats) so his parents throw him in a
basket on a park river that carries him below Gotham City's sewers. After 33
years this orphan kid emerges from the sewers as Oswald Cobblepot, AKA The
Penguin (Danny DeVito), a freaky-looking dude that's also a member of the Red
Triangle Gang that terrorizes the citizens of Gotham when these attempt to
light-up the Rockefelle... I mean, the Gotham City Christmas Tree. Cue the
Bat Signal, which quickly attracts the attention of Bruce Wayne, AKA Batman
(Michael Keaton), and sends him running to the rescue in his rocket-powered
Batmobile. Although it initially seems that the Red Triangle Gang wants to
kidnap Gotham's Mayor (Michael Murphy) these clowns are really after the
city's wealthy patron, the corrupt and unscrupulous Max Shreck (Christopher
Walken). Shreck escapes while Batman takes care of business, but eventually
winds-up in The Penguin's lair and is lured by the villain into a partnership
that will allow both men to take advantage of each other's organizations.
Meanwhile Max Shreck's secretary, the klutzy and
ugly-but-pretty-behind-her-glasses Selina Kyle (Michelle Pfeiffer), has been
having a bad day of her own. After being saved by Batman from one of the Red
Triangle Gang thugs and discovering that her boss is swindling the citizens
of Gotham with his power plant schemes, she is thrown out of a window by
Shreck himself and apparently plummets to her death. After being revived
from licks by dozens of alley cats (!) she destroys her cozy little apartment
and sews herself a new rubber outfit in the shape of a cat, thus giving birth
to Catwoman. You can imagine Shreck's shock when he sees the following
morning that the woman he thought he had killed the night before is still
alive, but Bruce Wayne (visiting Shreck's office during a business meeting)
becomes interested in Selina and the two start flirting. While these two are
getting to know each other (unaware of their secret personalities at first)
The Penguin emerges from his sewer hideout as Gotham's new hero after staging
a mock rescue of the Mayor's son. He and Shreck use the publicity to build a
political campaign so that Oswald can have a run at being Gotham's Mayor, but
to do so they have to make the local citizens feel unsafe with the current
administration.
Batman has his work cut out for him this time. Not only must he expose Max
Shreck and Oswald Cobblepot for the frauds they are, but also has prevent The
Penguin's Red Triangle Gang from carrying the villain's ultimate revenge
plan: the kidnapping and riddance of the first-born male sons of Gotham's
elite (as if the opening scene of baby Oswald's basket being dragged by the
river Moses-style wasn't a biblical reference strong-enough to make the point
he's a tortured soul). He must also deal as Bruce Wayne with his growing
attraction toward Selina Kyle and as Batman with the psycho-sexual tension
between him and the whip-wielding madwoman dressed in a cat outfit that
almost kills him the couple of times they've fought. Eventually these
enemies, the hero and his secrets come together in a final showdown at the
Penguin's hideout (an abandoned theme park) that has to be seen to be
believed... my adults! I felt the graphic violence, electrocutions and
deaths of the first "Batman" came too close to an 'R' rating in their
intensity and context, but those scenes might as well be part of a
"Teletubbies" episode compared with the depraved and nihilistic manner in
which "Batman Returns" concludes (Chapters 34-37).
I've seen violent 'R' rated horror movies with a more positive outlook on
life than what the dark and cavernous shadows of the towering sets in "Batman
Returns" reveal. For the second "Batman" movie in a row the action sequences
and stunts also fail to impress, coming across as awkward movements
cleverly-edited to make it seem like more than what's actually happening is
taking place. Part of me admires the chutzpah that Burton, his
writers (Daniel Waters and Sam Hamm) and production crew show in not going
for laughs or a sugar-coated happy ending just because the vast majority of
the people that went to see this movie back in 1992 were kids. The risqué
sexual banter between Catwoman and The Penguin and the obvious S&M visual
references when the former and Batman are sizing each other up is the stuff
13 year-old boys (and older Japanese men) fantasize about. But Bruce Wayne
and Selina Kyle's timid courtship isn't given enough screen time because
Burton's more interested in setting-up the rise and fall of Oswald
Cobblepot's Mayoral candidacy so that viewers can relate to his eventual
return into criminal life. It's almost as if Wayne/Batman and Kyle/Catwoman
are relegated to being supporting players in a movie in which the two of them
happen to be the primary attraction!
The vacuum left by the absence of a villain/actor as towering as Jack
Nicholson/The Joker was in the first "Batman" forced the producers of "Batman
Returns" to rely a formula that Warner Bros. used for every live-action
"Batman" flick that followed: double-team the villains and cast big stars to
play them. Danny DeVito's histrionics as The Penguin don't have the charming
menace that made Nicholson's Joker such a joy to watch in the prequel. His
character is supposed to be a tortured human being in search for the love he
never had as a child, but DeVito's performance and the make-up don't let
humanity shine through the smirk in his eyes for even a second (thus killing
what little chance the character had of attracting audience sympathy when his
time is up). As Catwoman Michelle Pfeiffer exudes pure sexual mischief, and
has never been a more desirable on-screen sex symbol than when she slips into
her cleverly-designed rubber suit and starts prancing around Gotham with a
whip by her side; without her suit she's kind of dull and lethargic, but
that's the life of a Batman villain I guess. The Max Shreck character is
just plain dull though, with the versatile Christopher Walken playing an even
more boring and inconsequential villain than the one he played eight years
prior "A View To A Kill").
Last but not least, Michael Keaton's acting chops finally give the Bruce
Wayne/Batman persona a believability and conviction in "Batman Returns" that
I didn't see in the prequel. He emerges more clearly as a tortured soul
desperate to find someone like him, which he mistakenly thinks he has found
in Selina/Catwoman. The scenes where Wayne is talking to either Selina
(Ch.22) or Alfred (Ch.27) about her failed romance to Vicki Vale are touching
without being sappy because the audience can feel how that has taken a bigger
emotional/physical toll on the character than his nightly encounters with
armed bad guys terrorizing Gotham's population. The final plead to Catwoman
during the final scene to join him (Ch.35) rings true with every aspect of
the character that has been established up to that point (Bruce Wayne would
be more attracted to a self-destructive personality similar to his own than,
say, Vicki Vale's). This is perhaps the emotional highlight of the entire
live-action "Batman" saga in terms of raw naked emotion being expressed by
these flawed characters and their actions. Val Kilmer did a few very good
things with his take on the same character three years later in "Batman
Forever", but after "Batman Returns" there can be no argument:
Michael
Keaton is Batman
.
Michael Gough and Pat Hingle also solidify themselves as the best Alfred and
Commissioner Gordon to ever appear on a live-action "Batman" project. Also
watch for the opening scenes in which Tucker Cobblepot appears on camera, and
realize that the actor playing the father of the genetically-mutated Penguin
is none other than Pee-Wee Herman his own self, Paul Reubens (talk about
typecasting!). It's a shame that the box office take wasn't as good for
"Batman Returns" as it was for the prequel. This, along with all the
negative publicity from parents outraged at the level of violence and
negativity in the story, gave Warner Bros. executives cold feet. They chose
to push the franchise 180 degrees opposite of where Tim Burton was taking it,
which resulted in the two following sequels losing touch with the character's
fan base and the aspects that made the first two "Batman" movies so special.
Oh well, better luck with Darren Aranofsky guys!
The Disc:
"Batman Returns" was released alongside "Batman" and "Batman Forever" back in
August of 1997, when the DVD format was in its infancy. My expectations were
low for the sequel to look/sound marginally better than the prequel after
experiencing first-hand how bad Warner fumbled the ball with the quality of
the transfer process used in "Batman". I'm pleased to report that "Batman
Returns" is a step in the right direction. Once again the viewer is given a
choice of watching a widescreen anamorphic version of the film on one side of
the disc or a full-frame version on the other; Burton shot the movie with
only a 1:78:1 aspect ratio, so those misguided souls that hate to see black
bars in their TV sets won't be missing too much detail or picture. Speaking
of which, the print used for the transfer still has quite a few grain spots
and dirt specs to distract the viewer from time to time. But this time the
depth of the black portions of the picture has increased while the amount of
compression artifacts seem to have been substantially reduced. This movie's
black levels no longer resemble the gray meshes seen in "Batman", and the
primary colors and sharpness of the picture are good-enough to see details in
the background (like the branches in the Christmas tree on Gotham's central
square).
I'm convinced this picture would look outstanding if Warner had coded the DVD
with a double layer instead of the standard-back-in-'97 single layer
treatment. Something else that has improved from "Batman" to "Batman
Returns" is the quality of the sound. We get a richer, fuller and much
cleaner Dolby 5.1 soundtrack that makes Danny Elfman's theme, Catwoman's
meows (!), missile explosions and the squeaks of The Penguin's army of
mind-controlled penguins sound as if they're coming from right within your
viewing area. It's not as aggressive or well-implemented a track as the
one's we're used to hearing in today's modern movies (panning attempts are a
joke), but I don't recall ever hearing "Batman Returns" sound this good
either on TV broadcasts or at the movie theater back in '92. The Special
Features are non-existent though, consisting only of the useless Film
Flash (plugs for other "Batman" and Tim Burton movies) and the
somewhat-interesting Production Notes
. Some interesting
tidbits of data are shared in the still screens that make-up these notes,
which have been divided into four categories (Special Effects, Hero &
Villains, The Screenwriter and The Composer) for the reader's convenience.
The information about how Stan Winston's effects crew helped animate an army
of penguins, in particular, is interesting considering he went on to do
"Jurassic Park" the following year. After Warner's done with the Special
Edition DVD of "Batman" I also want them to do one for "Batman Returns".
These two movies are so similar and display such twisted visions from the
same director about the same comic book hero and the universe he inhabits
that they should both be re-released with their proper bells & whistles.
Rehearsal footage? Commentary? Deleted Scenes? Bloopers? We want them!
bottom line:
The production design, acting and special effects of the movie are solid,
but the storyline is uneven to the point of relegating Batman to
supporting-character status in his own movie! The shocking ending (pun
intended!) and weird sexual overtones still leave me numb from knowing they
got past the MPAA's 'PG-13' guidelines. "Batman Returns" looks/sounds better
than 1989's "Batman" (a superior prequel shackled by a crummier DVD
transfer), but so much more could have been done with a character as complex
as Batman and a universe as warped as Bob Kane's than what Burton & Co.
deliver here. It's all downhill from here I'm afraid.
By - J.M. Vargas

