The criminal underworld has terrorized the residents of Gotham City for a
long time, but now the crooks are scared s***tless because of a new unknown
crime fighter that everyone has heard of but few have actually seen. Known
simply as 'The Bat' by those goons unfortunate-enough to have crossed his
path, the existence of this mysterious being is just the kind of hyped and
hot lead that newspaper reporter Alexander Knox (Robert Wuhl, from HBO's
"Arli$$") and acclaimed photographer Vicki Vale (Kim Bassinger) need to form
an alliance to track down this crime fighter. When Knox and Vale trick their
way into the a glitzy party at the home of Gotham City philathroper Bruce
Wayne (Michael Keaton) they don't realize that the kooky-looking billionaire
they're talking to is really 'The Bat'. With the help of his trusty butler
Alfred Pennyworth (Michael Gough), Wayne overhears a conversation with the
city's Police Commissioner (Pat Hingle) indicating that a certain Jack Napier
(Jack Nicholson) is heading to Gotham's Axis Chemical Factory to do some
dirty work for his crime boss Grissom (Jack Palance). Wayne slips into his
crime fighting costume and heads to Axis Chemical along with the cops,
unaware that Grissom has set up a trap to kill Napier because of the latter's
indiscretion with the former's main squeeze.
Batman arrives at the factory in time to get into a couple of scuffles with
Napier's men and to be seen for the first time by Commissioner Gordon and his
men. Napier himself falls into a tank full of chemicals that, combined with
some shoddy back alley surgery, disfigure the mentally unstable criminal to
the point of insanity. Thus The Joker is born, a psychopathic maniac without
remorse that takes bloody revenge against Grissom and quickly rises to the
top of Gotham's criminal food chain. Meanwhile Bruce Wayne and Vicki Vale
begin hitting it of romantically, much to the chagrin of reporter Knox and
every other man that is mesmerized by Vale's beauty. This also includes The
Joker, who becomes infatuated with the photographer and takes a time-out from
spreading killer chemicals in household appliances to set-up an elaborate
trap to capture her at Gotham's Fluegelheim Museum. Of course Batman shows
in the nick of time to save Vale from The Joker's goons, but will he be able
to keep his identity secret when the photographer is already figuring out on
her own that Bruce Wayne isn't the person he appears to be? And will he able
to defeat The Joker in a final, mano-a-mano showdown?
It's hard to believe it's been 13 years since Tim Burton's vision of what a
Batman movie should look and be like took over the cinematic world by storm.
With "Beetlejuice" collaborators (Michael Keaton, screenwriters Sam Hamm &
Warren Skaaren, composer Danny Elfman, etc.) working alongside many veterans
of the "Superman" movies (like Visual Effects guru Derek Meddings) and other
creative minds of the era (Production Designer Anton Furst, Director of
Photography Roger Pratt, etc.), Burton's vision is so close to its source
material that it almost creates its own genre: comic book noir.
Not as violent or graphic as a "Tales From The Crypt" installment or
"Creepshow" movie, but way more depressing and morally ambiguous than your
kid-friendly "Superman" movie or "Incredible Hulk" TV episode, "Batman" seems
to dare parents NOT to let their little kids watch it alone. People get
shot, electrocuted, thrown off buildings, beaten, poisoned or stabbed in the
neck with a pen (mightier than the sword, indeed).
These deaths and fights aren't bloody, but take place within the gothic
atmosphere and violent content of a pretty bleak story. The action scenes
lack the thrill and exhilaration of an Indiana Jones or Superman adventure,
and seem to be poorly-choreographed even when no special effects are involved
(the knife-wielding black karateka dude comes to mind). The main character
(Bruce Wayne/Batman) is a troubled man dealing with criminals (The Joker and
his goons) while trying to rediscover a humanity that only the love of a
woman (Vicki Vale) and the fatherly advice of his closest confidant (Alfred
Pennyworth) can bring out of his self-made shelf. On the wrong hands
material like this could have ended up being just plain silly, but director
Burton and his actors are game-enough to give these Bob Kane characters a
degree of personality that's sorely missing from the live-action "Batman"
installments that followed. Jack Nicholson stole the movie (along with most
of the box office receipts) with a manic rendition of The Joker that is both
spooky and disturbingly-amusing; the same could be said about Jim Carrey's
performance in "Batman Forever", but Nicholson wisely held back the
histrionics and injected enough menace into his performance to actually
project an illusion of calculated menace.
It's a shame that none of the other actors playing bad guys alongside
Nicholson (Jack Palance's Grissom, Tracey Walter's Bob The Goon, etc.) can
match wits on an even playing field with The Joker, since back-and-forth
dialogue between cool bad guys is always more fun to watch than monologues
WHEN IT'S DONE RIGHT. Michael Keaton, while looking a bit out of it in blue
jeans and glasses sitting in front of the Bat Computer (where the monitors
showing Nicholson's mug clearly out-act him), brings human vulnerability to
Bruce Wayne while looking OK wearing the Bat suit. "Batman Returns"
solidified Keaton as the best actor that has donned the Batman mask, while
Kim Bassinger's Vicki Vale is an attractive and pleasant-enough love interest
to make her absence in the sequel worthy of Bruce Wayne's longing look and
sad attitude. Michael Gough's Alfred and Pat Hingle's Commissioner Gordon
(the only two characters that have been played by the same actors in all four
"Batman" live-action movies) are outstanding, but Robert Wuhl's reporter
character wasn't funny and annoyed the heck out of me. Very poor decision on
the part of Burton and his writers to use this reporter as a conduit through
which to arrange the whole 'who is The Bat?' premise that eventually leads to
Vale and Wayne becoming an item.
The first of the modern-era "Batman" movie also benefits from the nostalgia
with which today's generation of movie-goers watch special effects-laden
blockbusters from decades in which they were growing up. The movie can stand
on its own story-telling and acting merits, which prevents the obvious matte
paintings, wires above Batman moving him around, miniature buildings and
vehicles (like the Bat Plane) and embarrassing low-rent locations (like that
dingy Bat Cave) from dating this 13 year-old film too badly. I'd also take
Danny Elfman's "Batman" score over the overblown Elliot Goldenthal score for
the Schumacher movies on any day. It's not as good or exciting a story as
"Superman The Movie" or "X-Men" (nowhere near!), but "Batman" drenches its
viewers with a morally-corrupt villain and a lead character that inhabits a
self-inflicted bleak world that is the direct result of the bad guy's
actions. It's not a formula custom-made for exciting stunts or clever
one-liners, and Burton & Co. should be commended for not succumbing to the
temptation of giving the masses the brain-dead and easily-churned bullshit
they were probably expecting back in '89. It's a shame that, after this and
1992's "Batman Returns", the powers-at-be over at Warner Brothers chose to
follow the formula of its own "Superman" movies and plunged the franchise
head-first right down the toilet.
The Disc:
Those same Warner powers-that-be also didn't work too hard during the
transfer process in bringing Roger Pratt's cinematography or Tim Burton's
vision to home theaters without major visual and aural compromises. "Batman"
can be seen in either its intended theatrical aspect ratio or a full-screen
version by flipping the DVD over (flipper alert, flipper alert), but by
coding the DVD with a single layer instead of today's common dual layer
process the quality of the picture never rises above mediocrity. A movie
like this, which relies on darkness in almost every scene (indoors as well as
outdoors) to create a perpetual mood of opaque bleakness, requires as
pristine and artifact-free a transfer as possible. "Batman" features not
only an average-at-best video transfer that makes the darkness of Gotham City
look gray instead of black, but also plenty of grain spots and film
imperfections that impede even the handful of primary colors in the movie
(like those in The Joker's wild outfits) from shining through. The
menu/option screens are static, and the 'Jump To A Scene' feature is almost
useless because it lumps the chapter stops into groups without a title or
visual cue to indicate how to reach many of the movie's best scenes.
Joining hand-in-hand with the mediocre visuals is a lousy Dolby Digital 5.1
English soundtrack that comes across more as a 1970's monaural film
soundtrack ("The Godfather" and "The Godfather Part II" DVD tracks come to
mind). It sounds like the movie's original soundtrack remixed into more than
two speakers for the sake of filling one's entertainment set with
electricity, with no panning or discernible aural benefit to any element of
the soundtrack except for the clarity of the voices. I like to hear The
Joker's wild histrionics as much as the next guy, but I'd also like to hear
his cool and looooooooong pistol shoot a bullet that sounds more like a
cannon or a missile instead of a blown-up foley effect. The poor quality of
the video and audio of the first two "Batman" live action films suffer from
being guinea pigs of the DVD format when they were released way back in
August of 1997 (the first year DVD became commercially available). This is
obvious in the DVD's non-existent 'Special Features', which are just some
badly-arranged Production Notes that barely-hint at the
behind-the-scenes talent, star power and media hype that accompanied the
release of this film back in the summer of 1989. A Special Edition re-issue
of this modern-day classic with the proper bells & whistles cannot come out
soon enough, since 'Film Recommendations' of other Warner Bros. movies never
cut it with the public even back in the dark ages of '97.
bottom line:
The writing is on the wall for this bare-bones DVD version of what most
people consider Batman's best live-action adventure yet, since a much-better
version is rumored to already on the double-dip release pipeline. For
fifteen bucks though, the movie itself is still a compelling mix of the good
(period atmosphere, Nicholson's manic performance), the bad (dated special
effects, an uneven performance by Michael Keaton) and the ugly (inadequate
5.1 audio track, mediocre video transfer). That's the price "Batman" pays
for being a pioneer of the format.
By - J.M. Vargas

